WEBVTT 00:10.670 --> 00:11.720 OK, good. 00:12.590 --> 00:20.930 That was what the concert, the concert was about, and now we're going into another subject within 00:20.930 --> 00:24.400 the same area of philosophy of mine is called intentionality. 00:25.400 --> 00:32.750 So intentionality is not something that was invented by John SERM, but he is maybe the person living 00:32.750 --> 00:38.330 today that has made it very much more popular in the philosophy community and written a very good book 00:38.330 --> 00:38.750 about it. 00:39.020 --> 00:44.310 And he's one of the heroes of mine as well, is still going strong up in Berkeley in US. 00:45.830 --> 00:53.270 Here's one quote when he's trying to talk about what intentionality is about and what it's not about. 00:53.810 --> 00:57.190 So my car in my adding machine understands nothing. 00:57.200 --> 01:01.880 They are not in the same line of business, so they do not have an intentionality. 01:02.600 --> 01:05.960 So the intentionality is the boldness of the mind. 01:08.300 --> 01:14.390 So intentionality is the way that the mind is directed at or about the world. 01:14.540 --> 01:21.020 So we have the mind up in our brain and we have things outside in the world. 01:21.590 --> 01:27.040 And that is the intentionality is how the mind is about that world. 01:28.070 --> 01:31.850 So intentionality, it consists of two things, actually. 01:31.880 --> 01:40.460 It has a propositional content, which is usually do not LSP, and it has a psychological mode as so 01:40.460 --> 01:43.460 you can actually write it as as brackets B.. 01:44.060 --> 01:48.860 So in this concrete example, we have this handshake going on out in the world. 01:49.130 --> 01:56.780 And my proposition constant about that is that it is an agreement and then I can have different psychological 01:56.990 --> 01:59.420 attitudes towards that propositional content. 01:59.720 --> 02:06.230 So I can think that it is the that they are making an agreement that could be a belief or mine. 02:08.870 --> 02:17.450 So the propositional content is whatever that clauses contribute to, whatever the tension out is about. 02:17.930 --> 02:18.300 Right. 02:18.620 --> 02:21.290 So Ralph believes that Jack Sparrow is alive. 02:21.590 --> 02:23.630 Ralph hopes that Jack Sparrow is alive. 02:24.290 --> 02:26.410 Ralph decides that Jack Sparrow is alive. 02:26.870 --> 02:35.570 They are all of them are three different intentional states, but they have the same propositional content. 02:35.840 --> 02:39.500 But one is a belief, the other one is a desire, and the last one is the hope. 02:40.910 --> 02:43.370 And the first one, for example, here could be stated. 02:43.370 --> 02:46.280 I believe Brackett's Jack Sparrow is alive. 02:48.200 --> 02:53.480 So exactly as I showed you here, the psychological mode could vary even if the propositional content 02:53.480 --> 02:54.380 stays intact. 02:56.120 --> 02:58.160 So I believe that you will leave the room. 02:58.160 --> 03:02.450 I wonder whether you are ever going to leave the room, wish that you would leave the room and cetera, 03:02.450 --> 03:03.060 et cetera. 03:03.410 --> 03:10.670 They are all different psychological modes with the same propositional content, and they are actually 03:10.670 --> 03:11.860 generic modes here. 03:11.870 --> 03:17.810 So they are desires and beliefs which are maybe the two primary modes, and then they are intention 03:17.810 --> 03:22.040 and actions, perceptions, memory and prior intention. 03:23.390 --> 03:30.350 However, many people actually argue that the beliefs and desires could be used to form basically all 03:30.350 --> 03:31.520 of the other modes. 03:31.670 --> 03:38.010 Not all people agree with that, but I will show an example how that potentially could be done, how 03:38.010 --> 03:42.410 you could derive other psychological modes based on just beliefs and desires. 03:43.400 --> 03:45.440 So take this example. 03:46.130 --> 03:49.910 I hope that Jack Sparrow is alive, right. 03:50.540 --> 03:59.270 That could maybe denote that as I do not believe that Jack Sparrow is alive and not believe that not 03:59.270 --> 04:01.250 Jack Sparrow is alive because I don't know. 04:01.370 --> 04:01.750 Right. 04:02.030 --> 04:07.800 And believe that it's possible that Jack Sparrow is alive and desire that Jack Sparrow is alive. 04:07.940 --> 04:11.030 So here I've used kind of three beliefs and one desire. 04:11.360 --> 04:17.330 And in combination with the logical operators, they form what it is to be hoping for something. 04:19.680 --> 04:20.400 Um. 04:22.410 --> 04:29.460 And as a just a note to that, so however, even if feelings and emotions in part could be described 04:29.460 --> 04:33.130 as a combination, they also contain something more, such as love and hate and so on. 04:33.480 --> 04:39.090 So, as I said, you could come a long way using beliefs and desires to combine. 04:39.090 --> 04:45.480 And when you combine them, they can form other psychological modes by you not be able to go all the 04:45.480 --> 04:45.720 way. 04:48.000 --> 04:51.310 OK, then there is a third thing here about intentionality. 04:51.360 --> 04:55.870 It also has something that is called conditions of satisfaction, or at least that is something that 04:55.890 --> 05:00.970 concerns talks a lot about when he talks about intentionality and what does it mean about that? 05:01.170 --> 05:06.450 So the propositional content also determines what will count as its conditions of satisfaction. 05:07.320 --> 05:09.150 What makes that belief true? 05:09.600 --> 05:12.480 What makes the intentions and desires fulfilled? 05:15.030 --> 05:23.490 So let's have an example, so I have this proposition and the content and the conditions and actually 05:23.610 --> 05:30.240 just standing here to be clear that the proposition doesn't have to be text or lack of written sentence 05:30.240 --> 05:36.930 or something could be anything, any way of holding that information that I have in my desire. 05:37.380 --> 05:42.000 So here it is, just kind of internal picture to me, drinking something. 05:43.200 --> 05:48.870 But I will also have a conditional satisfaction here that what makes this belief true then is when water 05:48.870 --> 05:52.010 gets inserted into my mouth in one way or another. 05:52.020 --> 05:52.400 Right. 05:53.910 --> 06:02.230 So maybe here I have a desire for water and that is fulfilled if I get water, OK? 06:04.670 --> 06:10.190 And there is also a fourth thing here, so that was the condition, so so that was the conditions of 06:10.190 --> 06:10.880 satisfaction. 06:10.900 --> 06:16.760 It's like the third thing here, and that is also actually a fourth thing when we're talking about intentional, 06:16.790 --> 06:20.990 that is very important to keep in mind, and that is the direction of it. 06:22.760 --> 06:25.940 So the direction of it is related to the world and the mine. 06:25.940 --> 06:28.280 And this is actually going to be very important later on. 06:28.280 --> 06:35.220 The analysis you will see coming up on a number of different stages in this meta analysis. 06:35.750 --> 06:42.620 So if we have the world and we have the mind, right, then the conditions are satisfied if the content 06:42.620 --> 06:45.290 matched the world in a certain direction of fit. 06:47.270 --> 06:53.900 So, for example, if I have a belief in my mind that a runner with the starting number eight won the 06:53.900 --> 07:00.110 race, if that is the conditions of satisfaction in my belief and the proposition as this runner crossing 07:00.110 --> 07:02.500 the line is I have this number eight on and so on. 07:02.870 --> 07:08.690 So that's the propositional content that is mine to world because it's a belief. 07:08.690 --> 07:09.030 Right. 07:09.350 --> 07:18.050 So I would like my or sorry, I think that my belief fit the real world scenario. 07:19.590 --> 07:28.890 OK, however, if I decide something, then I have a world to mind fit instead of mine to world fit, 07:29.490 --> 07:29.910 right? 07:30.390 --> 07:38.190 Because if I desire water in my mouth and it gets satisfied when water gets inserted into my mouth, 07:38.730 --> 07:47.220 then the the the the direction of it is that I will like the world to match my propositional content 07:47.220 --> 07:48.750 instead of the other way around. 07:50.820 --> 07:56.670 So some psychological modes have a mind to world fit and some have a will to mind fit. 07:58.200 --> 08:02.370 So remember that, because that's actually going to be very important, even if it looks a little bit 08:02.370 --> 08:03.410 abstract right now. 08:06.190 --> 08:06.700 OK. 08:08.880 --> 08:13.560 That was an overview of intentionality and. 08:15.370 --> 08:22.620 The next thing is they were going to go through something that is called the background and the network 08:22.620 --> 08:23.640 of intentionality. 08:24.660 --> 08:30.360 But before that, I will actually do a wrap up and what we have learned so far in a summary lecture.