WEBVTT 00:08.830 --> 00:13.870 How she is meaning through speech marking. 00:15.950 --> 00:22.700 So we talk about sentence meaning, but now we're trying to catch a little bit broader notion about 00:22.700 --> 00:27.170 meaning, the intended meaning of the utterance and not just the literal meaning. 00:28.010 --> 00:29.140 So what is going on here? 00:29.690 --> 00:32.120 So let's say that we start with this. 00:32.150 --> 00:38.750 So I have a cat out there and I have a believe that there is a cat on the mat. 00:39.110 --> 00:45.230 And here I'm just expressing the proposition in our mind as kind of a generic picture, just stating 00:45.230 --> 00:48.190 that it doesn't have to be text or propositions. 00:48.200 --> 00:49.600 Of course, you know, attentional states. 00:50.000 --> 00:53.960 So let's say they have this proposition that is an image of a cat on the mat. 00:54.500 --> 00:56.630 And I have a condition of satisfaction. 00:56.630 --> 00:57.680 That is true. 00:57.680 --> 01:06.020 If a cat is actually sitting on the mat and I have my belief and this belief, then have what we call 01:06.020 --> 01:08.160 the mind to a world fit for. 01:08.180 --> 01:14.420 Remember that that in parallel to this, I then can also have an assertion, which is a speech act, 01:14.780 --> 01:19.380 and the assertion has a proposition saying that there is a fluffy mouse catcher on the mouse. 01:19.460 --> 01:20.720 That's what I'm actually saying. 01:23.120 --> 01:24.930 OK, but there needs to be something more here. 01:25.280 --> 01:31.750 So here's the correlation between a belief and an assertion, but there needs to be a third thing here 01:31.760 --> 01:36.350 that needs to be yet another intentional state which actually have the form of an intention. 01:36.650 --> 01:44.000 Because what that intention is saying, like a meta level intention here, is that this utterance that 01:44.000 --> 01:49.070 I just that I'm seeing right now, i.e. the utterance of saying that there is a fluff, the catch much, 01:49.730 --> 01:56.810 that it's a fluffy mouse catcher on the mat, this actress has identical conditions of satisfactions 01:56.810 --> 01:58.630 as my belief that I also have. 01:58.640 --> 02:01.190 So I have this intentional stated reason to believe. 02:01.400 --> 02:07.250 I'm saying this expression right now and I have a third intentional state or a second intentional state 02:07.250 --> 02:13.970 or theme here that is saying that I'm intending something when I'm expressing this. 02:14.240 --> 02:21.140 And what I'm intending is that the conditions of satisfaction, of my belief is the same condition of 02:21.140 --> 02:23.270 satisfaction as my utterance. 02:24.590 --> 02:25.010 Right. 02:25.730 --> 02:31.430 So this intention, which is also an intentional state. 02:32.320 --> 02:35.850 Is saying that the conditions of satisfaction should be the same. 02:36.950 --> 02:42.440 And then since this conditional satisfaction is the same, the assertion will also have the same direction 02:42.440 --> 02:47.510 of fit, so it will have to show a course road to world fit. 02:49.510 --> 02:49.860 OK. 02:51.500 --> 02:55.500 So that's how you can explain the intended meaning. 02:55.760 --> 03:02.140 So you bring in another intentional states or just not one correlation between one intentional statement 03:02.180 --> 03:06.650 of speech is actually an intention as well mixed into this. 03:07.940 --> 03:13.220 So if you think about that and we think about the doctor's case and everything, then you see that this 03:13.220 --> 03:16.530 intentional thing is the one that makes the difference. 03:18.080 --> 03:20.030 The intention, intentional state.