How she is meaning through speech marking.
So we talk about sentence meaning, but now we're trying to catch a little bit broader notion about
meaning, the intended meaning of the utterance and not just the literal meaning.
So what is going on here?
So let's say that we start with this.
So I have a cat out there and I have a believe that there is a cat on the mat.
And here I'm just expressing the proposition in our mind as kind of a generic picture, just stating
that it doesn't have to be text or propositions.
Of course, you know, attentional states.
So let's say they have this proposition that is an image of a cat on the mat.
And I have a condition of satisfaction.
That is true.
If a cat is actually sitting on the mat and I have my belief and this belief, then have what we call
the mind to a world fit for.
Remember that that in parallel to this, I then can also have an assertion, which is a speech act,
and the assertion has a proposition saying that there is a fluffy mouse catcher on the mouse.
That's what I'm actually saying.
OK, but there needs to be something more here.
So here's the correlation between a belief and an assertion, but there needs to be a third thing here
that needs to be yet another intentional state which actually have the form of an intention.
Because what that intention is saying, like a meta level intention here, is that this utterance that
I just that I'm seeing right now, i.e. the utterance of saying that there is a fluff, the catch much,
that it's a fluffy mouse catcher on the mat, this actress has identical conditions of satisfactions
as my belief that I also have.
So I have this intentional stated reason to believe.
I'm saying this expression right now and I have a third intentional state or a second intentional state
or theme here that is saying that I'm intending something when I'm expressing this.
And what I'm intending is that the conditions of satisfaction, of my belief is the same condition of
satisfaction as my utterance.
Right.
So this intention, which is also an intentional state.
Is saying that the conditions of satisfaction should be the same.
And then since this conditional satisfaction is the same, the assertion will also have the same direction
of fit, so it will have to show a course road to world fit.
OK.
So that's how you can explain the intended meaning.
So you bring in another intentional states or just not one correlation between one intentional statement
of speech is actually an intention as well mixed into this.
So if you think about that and we think about the doctor's case and everything, then you see that this
intentional thing is the one that makes the difference.
The intention, intentional state.