WEBVTT 00:10.370 --> 00:15.910 But as you see, there is one left here, so declarations we don't have a match here. 00:16.400 --> 00:25.520 So if I'm saying, as I said, this party starts now, there's no actual intentional states directly 00:25.520 --> 00:26.190 linked to that. 00:26.270 --> 00:29.030 There's a couple of intentional states will look that we're going to look at. 00:29.030 --> 00:34.460 But there's no direct, intentional state in ways that I can believe in decided that the party started. 00:34.850 --> 00:39.020 But it will not actually start until I perform the declaration. 00:40.460 --> 00:42.860 The declaration doesn't have to be spoken word here. 00:42.890 --> 00:45.110 It could be any I didn't like that or. 00:45.810 --> 00:50.060 Wow, but I can't just believe it. 00:50.180 --> 00:53.390 And it makes a little bit more sense if you think about formal things. 00:53.400 --> 01:00.830 So if you were a judge, you cannot just think that you judging you have to do something formally. 01:00.830 --> 01:03.110 You have to say something formally when you're judging. 01:03.290 --> 01:03.660 Right. 01:04.430 --> 01:05.570 So that's the same way here. 01:05.600 --> 01:06.770 So that's declarations 01:09.560 --> 01:12.470 and the declarations. 01:12.470 --> 01:20.510 Actually, all the other states and both states and speech have a single direction, either direction 01:20.510 --> 01:25.870 or fit, but declaration have no direction of fit, and that makes them very unique. 01:26.240 --> 01:27.150 So let's look at that. 01:27.440 --> 01:35.000 So it's conditions of satisfaction that are fulfilled when the act as such, when I'm acting, when 01:35.000 --> 01:44.090 I'm doing this, when I'm saying this, for example, this part starts now all to alter the world in 01:44.090 --> 01:49.300 the way that the world is represented, to be altered in the propositional content. 01:50.480 --> 01:54.020 So and this is of extreme importance. 01:54.320 --> 01:57.900 And this is a typical Johnsonville example of this as well. 01:58.610 --> 02:06.270 So when I'm saying this party now, this party starts now, that's a proposition that actually expressed 02:06.270 --> 02:07.550 that a party have started. 02:07.880 --> 02:13.310 But it's it must be started by me saying it or I'm saying you're guilty. 02:13.370 --> 02:20.810 If I'm a judge, that means that the proposition expressed is saying that you're guilty, but it's not 02:20.810 --> 02:23.540 until I'm actually seeing that you become guilty. 02:24.980 --> 02:27.790 So I will have a double directional fit here. 02:28.100 --> 02:31.820 So we have a world to world to world direction of it. 02:32.120 --> 02:38.180 And that makes declarations very unique and very important when it comes to what we're going to talk 02:38.180 --> 02:40.370 about and related to conceptual analysis. 02:43.070 --> 02:47.880 So the power of declarations is one of the most important aspects of language. 02:48.350 --> 02:54.040 And the reason for that is that's how we use and that's how we create our social world. 02:54.320 --> 02:59.720 And that is what this book that I showed you, the John sawbuck here at the Making the Social World 02:59.720 --> 03:00.520 is all about. 03:00.770 --> 03:08.570 That's how declarations are combined in recursion models to define all types of institutions, all types 03:08.570 --> 03:15.790 of states, institutions, all types of facts about the everyday world we know. 03:17.300 --> 03:23.750 So if you just have this example in mind, if I'm a priest, I cannot just stand there by the world 03:23.820 --> 03:28.040 saying that that's if this works instead of saying that you're hereby married. 03:28.040 --> 03:30.880 I just think it very, very, very hard that you're married. 03:31.190 --> 03:32.360 It won't work quite. 03:32.720 --> 03:36.860 So it's part of the whole thing that I need to declare it to make it happen. 03:39.010 --> 03:39.940 OK, very good then. 03:39.950 --> 03:46.090 Now we have talked a lot about speech act and we have also touched a lot about the difference between 03:46.090 --> 03:49.480 sentence meaning and the utterance, real intended meaning. 03:49.750 --> 03:58.000 And they are two very different notions about meaning and are very important to understand the relationship 03:58.000 --> 04:04.690 between language and conceptual conceptually, what happens up in my mind and in our intentional states? 04:06.490 --> 04:07.790 OK, very good. 04:09.040 --> 04:15.190 The next election is going to be a wrap up for the language corner of the Richards Triangle and then 04:15.190 --> 04:16.690 we run into the metaphysics. 04:17.450 --> 04:17.800 Good.