OK, we're making good progress here.
So now we have actually done the second corner of the Texas Triangle about language and the stuff that
I'm going to cover about philosophy of language and discourse.
So let's do a little bit of a wrap up of that corner.
Then we rush off to the third corner.
So we have we have this triangle and we talk about concepts in our minds and philosophy of mind and
intentional states and so on.
Now we talk about language, about terms and propositions and speech acts and how they relate to intentional
states and meaning.
So we say that we are a race, the humans who have consciousness, intentionality and the capacity of
collective intentionality.
We can represent objects and facts that we believe Deci intend to do, etc. Language has different components
and on the lowest level, terms are combined into propositions that have sentence meaning.
Language is also the natural extension of intentionality.
Talked about speech acts or utterances, real intended meaning, and is made up of an illusionary force
and a proposition or a statement.
And the evolutionary force is the one that connects the intentionality with the language usage and corresponding
facts and objects in the world, so that when we looked upon the how intentional meaning gets created.
So if we continue with our conceptual model here that we're trying to create, we've talked about concepts
and objects and propositions and intentional states with a psychological mode and background ability
and so on, and they refer to each other in in a network.
Then we can add on then that intentional states leads to speech acts and they had a parallel form.
So speech I have a propositional content in terms of a statement.
I'm using the term statement here because I already use proposition and an illusionary force.
And the statement in the Speech Act means the proposition in the intentional state.
The statement is made up of signs and the signs could be references, it could be predicates, and the
predicate could also have a reference of the subject.
And the predicate refers to a general term, a concept which is signified like the predicate of being
a headmaster, and the reference could also refer to a concept or a real object.
And we also have facts.
So facts are combinations.
We talked a little bit about that, just touched briefly on it when we talked about the institutional
facts that are created by by declarations.
We'll talk more about facts in the next corner.
We also said that we have the dictionary for several different types.
So we had committees, we have directives, we have assertive and we have expressive.
And all they all those four are directly related to different type of psychological modes, used and
intentional states.
But then we had the very special one where we didn't have a direct connection to any psychological mode.
So that was the declaration.
Very good.
So that was the wrap up for the language component, the language corner in the autumn reaches triangle.
So now we're coming into the last one, which is going to be the most interesting one, I think.
And then we are all of them are interesting, but it's going to be fun.
And then after that, we're going to tie them together and kind of doing an analysis of all the knowledge
that we've gained so far and see what that teach us about conceptual analysis and conceptual modeling.
But again, see you that.