WEBVTT 00:10.310 --> 00:18.140 OK, just take one last lecture here about packaging, so I would just give you an example as well, 00:18.200 --> 00:22.780 how you could package the domain model that we did from the very beginning. 00:23.420 --> 00:29.390 So we did this domain model when we talked about the philosophical foundations for concept analysis 00:29.390 --> 00:30.560 and conceptual modelling. 00:31.610 --> 00:36.350 And we started off by talking about concepts as such. 00:36.560 --> 00:43.070 And then we talked about the intentional states that you have and the network of intentional states. 00:43.400 --> 00:48.890 We talked about that an intentional state is made up about psychological modes and the proposition. 00:49.280 --> 00:55.910 And it's also related that you have a background abilities in the background that you are that are so 00:55.910 --> 00:58.310 familiar for you and so common to you. 00:58.310 --> 01:03.350 So you don't actually have intentional states about them that you just take for granted that you can 01:03.350 --> 01:05.060 walk using your legs and so on. 01:05.570 --> 01:08.030 So you aren't actually going around thinking about that. 01:09.770 --> 01:16.790 And then we went into the philosophy of language and we talked about speech acts and speech act that 01:16.790 --> 01:24.380 are related to intentional states because intentional states are usually leads to speech act if you're 01:24.380 --> 01:27.610 talking or if you're using a language to express them. 01:28.370 --> 01:35.870 And the speech act is made up of an electioneering force and a statement as which is the propositional 01:35.870 --> 01:37.820 content for the speech. 01:38.630 --> 01:43.160 And the proposition in our intentional state means the statements we said. 01:44.210 --> 01:49.940 And then there were a couple of types of cautionary forces like submissives directive's assertions, 01:49.940 --> 01:56.030 expressive, and the special kind, which was called the Declaration Inwell Special, because all the 01:56.030 --> 02:01.790 other four had a direct connection up to psychological modes of the intentional state, whereas the 02:01.790 --> 02:07.430 declaration then we didn't have a direct link back to any of the psychological modes. 02:09.200 --> 02:18.740 The statement was then including predicates and references like the subject and a predicate in terms 02:18.740 --> 02:21.790 of the signs that you use in that particular language. 02:22.250 --> 02:28.130 And the predicate refers back to a concept which is the signified. 02:29.670 --> 02:37.670 And then you have also reference girls refer back to an individual concept or the object here. 02:39.690 --> 02:46.020 We also said that a proposition is what is called the truth bearer in relationship with facts. 02:46.380 --> 02:53.640 So we have facts about objects out in the real world and how and and their relationship to other properties. 02:53.640 --> 02:57.510 For example, saying that a car is pink is a fact. 02:57.970 --> 03:03.660 And then we talked about brute facts, which are facts that are out there without our interventions 03:03.690 --> 03:04.950 or we thinking about them. 03:05.130 --> 03:12.180 And then we have institutional facts that are created very peculiarly using our declaration so that 03:12.180 --> 03:19.470 where we tied up the the the relation between our language in terms of speech acts and declarations 03:19.590 --> 03:26.430 and how they actually create facts out in the world that we don't objectively actually can think exists. 03:26.460 --> 03:33.480 So we can objectively say that I have money, for example, but it's a relative fact that I have money 03:33.480 --> 03:38.860 because it's relative to other people's intentional states and collective intentionality. 03:41.460 --> 03:47.400 So we went through a law in that section and now we have also seen how we apply that very much more 03:47.400 --> 03:53.940 practically using the moral language of UML, using our workshop techniques and using our documentation 03:53.940 --> 03:55.100 techniques and packaging. 03:55.530 --> 04:01.410 So if we just go back to this model and then we can say that this, of course, is the concept model 04:01.410 --> 04:04.500 like any of all the other concept models we looked at. 04:05.870 --> 04:11.420 I will probably come up with something like this, I'm not showing you the whole solution here and maybe 04:11.420 --> 04:17.210 we would like to kind of reverse any of these associations and put some navigability on them. 04:17.630 --> 04:20.130 But this is probably something I will come up with. 04:20.510 --> 04:29.510 So we have a general notion about concepts, and they are one of the most basic key concepts in this 04:29.510 --> 04:30.000 domain. 04:30.710 --> 04:37.610 We also have another key concept called objects, which are out there, and another very fundamental 04:37.610 --> 04:44.960 concept called facts, so they can form kind of three different subdomains within this larger domain. 04:45.770 --> 04:52.100 Then we can have propositions, which is the propositional content in our minds and both both concepts 04:52.100 --> 04:58.280 about and they can include references to concepts reference to objects of reference to facts and state 04:58.280 --> 04:58.790 of affairs. 04:59.810 --> 05:07.160 And then what we can have intentional states, which actually include these propositional contents that 05:07.160 --> 05:09.080 are referring to all those three things. 05:09.410 --> 05:15.770 And we can also make statements in our language which could be included in speech act or often are most 05:15.770 --> 05:17.570 often are included in speech acts. 05:17.900 --> 05:21.170 And the Speech Act ties back to the intentionality. 05:21.170 --> 05:27.020 And here we get this meaning relation between the statements and the propositions and the intentionality 05:27.140 --> 05:28.160 in the Speech Act. 05:29.930 --> 05:33.050 So the Speech Act is the intended meaning. 05:34.830 --> 05:40.620 And then we also had a reference back to this much more general abilities that we have in the background, 05:41.640 --> 05:45.660 so something like this, and here you see that we could actually then layer on this. 05:46.290 --> 05:50.470 And that's a little bit how I introduce the concepts for you. 05:50.490 --> 05:55.840 So we started off talking about the most generic stuff like concepts in that area. 05:56.100 --> 05:59.040 We talked about objects and we talked about facts. 05:59.040 --> 06:01.860 And so they were very early on in those lectures. 06:02.310 --> 06:06.630 And then we added on the more complexity of intentionality and so on. 06:08.590 --> 06:09.390 OK, very good. 06:09.420 --> 06:17.980 That was just kind of a quick example of how you can use packaging to abstract and make a large model 06:17.980 --> 06:20.270 a little bit easier to dig into. 06:21.460 --> 06:24.850 So you can talking about some areas within the larger model. 06:26.410 --> 06:28.680 Good end of the section. 06:29.500 --> 06:29.920 See you.